Family Flyer 70
The Court’s Responsibility to Heed its own Overriding Objective
CH v WH  EWHC 2379: Mostyn J.
The Family court has a long tradition of not being constrained by the limits of the specific application placed before it. A master of the matrimonial law, Lord Justice Ormrod in Ward v Ward & Greene (1980) 1 AER 176 observed, at the end of an appeal in which it had been suggested that the court could not under the (then un-amended) s 24 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 make an order for sale without there also being a pro form summons before the Court under s 17 of the Married Women’s Property Act 1882, as follows:-
‘Before leaving the appeal finally, however, there is one point with which I want to deal…
To view the full flyer please click here.